🔗 Share this article Prosperous Period for American Billionaires: Why the System Perpetuates Wealth Inequality To numerous Americans, the economy over the past five years has been challenging. Expenses have skyrocketed while salaries remains stagnant. Elevated mortgage rates have made homeownership a grim prospect. The unemployment rate has been slowly rising. Many Americans have indicated they're postponing major life decisions, including having kids or switching jobs, because of economic uncertainty. But for a select few of people, the recent half-decade couldn't have been more successful. Fortune Expansion The wealth of the world's billionaires increased 54% in 2020, at the height of the pandemic. And even throughout all the financial uncertainty, the stock market has only continued to grow. This expansion has largely benefited just a limited group of Americans: 10% of the population holds 93% of stock market wealth. As uneven as this distribution seems, it's the economic framework working as it is currently designed. "Affluent individuals have purchased their jets, they've acquired their multiple houses and mansions, but now they're acquiring senators and media outlets," explained economic inequality analyst Chuck Collins. "We're now entering this other chapter of extreme wealth extraction where the wealthy are taking advantage of the system of inequality." Mapping Economic Classes To help others comprehend what exactly it means to be "wealthy" in the US, Collins utilizes a concept from journalist Robert Frank who, in a 2007 book on the rich, imagined the different levels of wealth as "Richistan" villages: Prosperity Village, Lower Richistan, Middle Richistan, Upper Richistan and Billionaireville. To update the concept, Collins classifies these "affluence districts" based on income levels: At the lowest tier, Affluent Town, are the 10 million Americans who have a annual salary of at least $110,000 and an total assets of over $1.5m. The villages get more restricted as wealth goes up: Lower Richistan has 2.6 million households who have wealth between $6m and $13m. Middle Richistan has 1.3 million households who have assets worth an average of $37m. Upper Richistan, made up of 130,000 Americans (roughly the size of a small city) has between $60m to $1bn in wealth. Altogether, the residents of these villages comprise the top 10% of the wealth income distribution, about 14 million Americans altogether, though their circumstances vary dramatically. "You could be in Lower Richistan, and you're still sitting in the coach section of a commercial plane," Collins explained. "Whereas in Upper Richistan, you're flying in a private jet. That's a really different cultural experience. You fly private, you have no interest in the commercial aviation system. You don't care if the whole system shuts down – you're set." Extreme Affluence Consequences The summit in "Richistan" is Billionaireville, which is made up of about 800 American billionaires who are some of the world's wealthiest. The control that this group has far surpasses those who are simply affluent, let alone the average American who doesn't reside in "Richistan" at all. But Collins thinks the activist mantra "billionaires shouldn't exist" fails to address the core issue and has a "suggestion of eradication" to it. "It's the difference between personal actions and a framework of policies," Collins commented. "We should be worried about an economic system that channels so much wealth upward to the billionaires." Fortune Building Strategies To understand how wealth at the billionaire level works, Collins separates it into four parts: accumulating assets, defending the wealth, government influence and extreme wealth removal. When many Americans think about wealth, they usually think exclusively about the first step, Collins said. People can create a modest amount of wealth through starting or running a successful business, which could get them admission in Affluent Town. But getting to Billionaireville requires substantial commitment and tactics in those next three steps. Collins describes what he calls the "asset protection sector": the tax lawyers, accountants and wealth managers who use their knowledge to ensure that the super rich are being calculated about their taxes. "Wealth defense professionals use a wide variety of tools such as trusts, offshore bank accounts, anonymous shell companies, non-profit organizations and other methods to hold assets," he details. Political Influence and Hyper-Extraction To further a wealth defense strategy, a family needs political support. Wealth of over $40m converts to political power, Collins says, and can be used to defend wealth and ensure continued growth. The last stage is a different kind of wealth accumulation, one that Collins calls "hyper extraction" to describe how the wealthy have come to affect nearly every single part of an Americans' everyday life largely through capital management, which allows wealthy individuals to invest in private companies. "Private equity is searching for those sectors of the economy where they can increase profits a little bit harder," Collins said. "One thing I don't think people understand is these billionaire private-equity funds are what happens when so much wealth is parked in so few hands, and they can kind of turn around and say, 'Where else can we squeeze money out of the economy?' Healthcare? Great. Mobile home parks? These people can't go anywhere, [so] you can increase their costs." Tangible Effects The effects of this inequality go beyond the wealth getting wealthier. It's about people spending additional funds for their healthcare, rent and vet bills without seeing any substantial income improvement. And Collins said the pain and frustration of this kind of society can lead to deep discontent. "The most powerful wealthy elites understand people are being marginalized [and] are economically suffering," Collins said, adding that Republicans have been good at connecting with a potent "phony populism". Policy Situation The irony, Collins points out in his book, is that elected representatives have appointed a succession of billionaires to cabinet positions. Along with tech billionaires who had temporary but significant roles overseeing substantial reductions to the federal workforce, other important roles for commerce, treasury, education and the interior are also all billionaires. This political landscape, along with help from congressional allies, helped pass significant fiscal policies, which will make enduring decreases for the wealthy and corporations. The Path Forward While government groups continue to argue that foreign entry and poor economic deals are the source of everyone's economic problems, "the challenge is: Will the alternative political group, which has also been controlled by the billionaires and big money, be able to seriously confront the underlying harms?" Collins said. Left-leaning officials, he argues, know what policies are needed to "reverse the updraft of wealth", including deep changes to the tax system, boosting the minimum wage and supporting labor organizations. "It was so, so close, and the bill really did represent the will of the most of people who really want lawmakers to address some of these urgent problems," Collins said. "Elite control is not about building so much as stopping. It's easier to block than it is to make something substantial take place, but the historical precedent is there. We know what that looks like." Collins is hopeful that there can be change, but said it would require ongoing legislative effort. "It may be before we know it that the tide turns, and then it really is about preserving a continuous public campaign to make progress on this extreme inequality we're living in," he said. "We can address this. It is solvable."